Skip to main content

An inconvenient truth ?


I have written this for my parish Magazine: "Viewpoint":

You may have heard of the film "An Inconvenient Truth" by Al Gore. It's very good and a number of us at St Mary's West Derby looked at it early this year before we gathered for a course on climate change called the Omega Course. The film is powerful and well worth watching. I think it's been on TV and you may well have seen it. The Church has a few copies of it on DVD if you would like to borrow it.

A book has been produced too and that is well worth a look. With the same title as the film it is subtitled "The planetary emergency of global warming and what we have to do about it". When I went away on a short course the other week with some other clergy we were asked to review the book. It shows how climate change is a reality and juxtaposes facts and figures with beautiful pictures of forests and ice caps. I can lend it to anyone who is interested.

One graph in the book brings the message home. It shows how the levels of CO2 in the atmosphere have increased to around 380 parts per million (ppm) today, this is a big increase from the levels before the industrial revolution (when we started digging all that carbon in the shape of coal and oil and gas out of the ground). The levels are still rising and he warns us that within 45 years they will be above 600ppm with the likelihood that global temperatures will be significantly higher. This would mean that many of our cities and coastal areas would be lost to the sea, and many more people would die through extreme weather - storm or flood or drought.

On the course we had an adviser who advised the government speak to us. He warned us that we were getting distracted by trivial issues like carrier bags. He told us that it matters what we do in the UK. We are in a position of power and influence but currently are doing the minimum. There has been no progress in the last 5 years in cutting our carbon levels.

We have thought of ourselves as the centre of the world. We have lived our lives as poor stewards of God's beautiful creation, seeing the world as ours to do with as we choose. Certainly the problem the result of human activity - it's about is how we have lived and how our parents have lived. We are responsible.

I think it's important to reach that point of acceptance. To take on some of the responsibility and not to blame those Americans with their gas guzzling 4 by 4s or those Chinese with their new cola fired power stations. If we can do that then we are in a position to move - individually and as a community - towards a way of living that preserves the lives of others and a world for our children. It's not climate change we need to fight - it's our behaviour. Perhaps an analogy is that of addiction to alcohol or drugs: we have become addicted to a high carbon lifestyle and we are finding it hard to let go.

And the sheer complexity of the issue makes it difficult to know what to do. Certainly we need to do something more significant than not using carrier bags. We need to very significantly cut the carbon we emit.

Our Christian tool kit offers us a lot of ways of thinking and acting that can lift us out of the despair which affects us all so badly on this issue. We are people who believe in hope, in new life, in the value of mustard seeds growing into big bushes. Certainly there are things we can do to change the way that you and I behave but much more than that there are Christian ways of thinking, and acting that could offer hope to humankind. We are in a position to influence events and be part of the redemption of human kind and not just its sinfulness.

Please pray about this challenge to God's planet and how we can respond. I would welcome your thoughts and ideas on what we can do at St Mary's and St James'. I have started a blog on the internet and would love to hear from you. If you type in hope4creation.blogspot.com you will find it.

With my prayers

Revd Mark

Popular posts from this blog

Nicholas - Bishop at Myra

What are people like ? Some are saints, some are sinners...you may say. Perhaps in the current age we would say : “Some are celebrities, some are scroungers” We do have a way - don't we - of putting things into binaries, black and white, yes and no, good and bad, this and that. It works for computer code but I don't know if it works for human beings made in the image of God..... Perhaps now more than in previous ages and certainly since the economics of the Thatcher era arrived, the neoliberal economics that makes the market its God, we have so many stories that make people other than ourselves...and so make it possible to cut their wages, to implement austerity. We have heard the stories about those who are poor and how they are to blame for their property because of the lack of initiative, laziness, fecklessness etc.  In today’s Rochdale Observer the story about poor children not being ready for primary school can be told to us as poor parenting causing t...

Greening the Eucharist ?

At breakfast at the Woodbrooke Quaker Study Centre yesterday I struggled to explain my research to an undoubtedly intelligent woman. Whilst certainly partly my failing, I was reminded that it is not natural to connect in the contemporary Christian mind (She was a practising Roman Catholic  the Eucharist and the Environment. Of course not ! That's why I am doing my research - that's the problem the research tries to tackle. So you can imagine how encouraged I was yesterday reading the book Greening Paul: Rereading the apostle in a time of ecological crisis which I would humbly suggest is trying to the same with St Paul as I and others are trying to do with the Eucharist. The authors of this book try to develop some "hermeneutical lenses" which are from the Christian tradition and yet at the same time can be the means for its critical reading afresh. I know that this sentence sets up some barriers immediately...

Changing the truth - Peer pressure

Two strands of thought have come together for me this morning. I was reading about how Margaret Thatcher, in 1990 made the conservative case for climate action but by 2003 had shifted her position. In 1990 Global warming was, she argued, “real enough for us to make changes and sacrifices, so that we do not live at the expense of future generations.”. But by 2003 she was calling climate action a “marvelous excuse for supra-national socialism". This is all recorded on the Grist website . Why the shift for Margaret ? Is the answer peer pressure?  It's not just politicians who follow the pack, we all do. To step outside of the reassurance and identity of the group you belong to, takes courage. It seems that Margaret Thatcher was influenced by right wing think-tanks. And I don't imagine that the ordinary conservative voter wanted to hear about the need to change lifestyle. (None of us do.... ) The other strand was hearing about Hannah Arendt's and the trial of Adolf...